Archives

  • 2018-07
  • 2019-04
  • 2019-05
  • 2019-06
  • 2019-07
  • 2019-08
  • 2019-09
  • 2019-10
  • 2019-11
  • 2019-12
  • 2020-01
  • 2020-02
  • 2020-03
  • 2020-04
  • 2020-05
  • 2020-06
  • 2020-07
  • 2020-08
  • 2020-09
  • 2020-10
  • 2020-11
  • 2020-12
  • 2021-01
  • 2021-02
  • 2021-03
  • 2021-04
  • 2021-05
  • 2021-06
  • 2021-07
  • 2021-08
  • 2021-09
  • 2021-10
  • 2021-11
  • 2021-12
  • 2022-01
  • 2022-02
  • 2022-03
  • 2022-04
  • 2022-05
  • 2022-06
  • 2022-07
  • 2022-08
  • 2022-09
  • 2022-10
  • 2022-11
  • 2022-12
  • 2023-01
  • 2023-02
  • 2023-03
  • 2023-04
  • 2023-05
  • 2023-06
  • 2023-07
  • 2023-08
  • 2023-09
  • 2023-10
  • 2023-11
  • 2023-12
  • 2024-01
  • 2024-02
  • 2024-03
  • 2024-04
  • 2024-05
  • During the past three decades platinum based

    2020-11-10

    During the past three decades, platinum-based DNA-alkylating agents have been employed in the treatment of various cancers [14]. Oxaliplatin is currently used as a first-line treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) [15]. Unfortunately, a large portion of CRC patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy develop chemoresistance and metastatic cancer in a short period of time [16], [17]. In general, metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients were treated with the combination regimen FOLFOX, including oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin, which improved response rates to >50%; however, because of its undesirable grade 3 to 4 toxicity, this regimen has a highly negative impact on quality of life [18], [19]. Recently, standard chemotherapeutics have been used in combination with targeted therapeutic agents to ameliorate the mortality of patients with advanced CRC. However, the 5-year survival rate of patients with mCRC is still only 13% [19]. Therefore, the development of a novel treatment strategy for advanced CRC is required to fulfill this unmet need. Discovering a novel agent that maintains therapeutic efficacy and reduces undesirable side effects is a fundamental requisite. Notably, among a series of DNA-directed alkylating agents, SL-1 was the most cytotoxic to CRC Cy5 NHS ester (non-sulfonated) and showed limited toxicity to the animal [13]. Therefore, we sought to investigate the clinical potential of SL-1 as a therapeutic agent against CRC cells. However, the preferential sequence targeted by the quinoline moiety of SL-1 is unclear. In this study, we determined the sequence to which SL-1 preferentially binds, evaluated its anti-CRC activity, and determined its animal safety/toxicity. We also explored the efficacy and safety of the combination of SL-1 with 5-FU against CRC cells.
    Materials and Methods Chemicals and enzymes, chemical synthesis of SL-1, and cell culture are included in Supplementary Materials and Cy5 NHS ester (non-sulfonated) Methods. The characteristics of the human CRC cell lines used in this study are summarized in Supplementary Table S1.
    Results
    Discussion While DNA-alkylating agents are used widely as first-line drugs for various cancers, the main limitations of simple alkylating agents are their lack of DNA sequence specificity [32]. Melphalan mainly induces dG-adducts at 5′-GNC-3′ and 5′-GC-3′ base pairs [32], whereas the platinum-based drugs principally bind to 5′-GG-3′ and 5′-GC-3′ base pairs [33]. In addition, the platinum-based alkylating agents generate more monoalkylation products than cross-links [33], [34], [35]. This observation may explain why platinum-based alkylating agents not only cause increased mutagenesis and carcinogenesis but also induce adverse side effects. To overcome these drawbacks, a DNA-directed alkylating agent with increased DNA-binding selectivity and reduced cytotoxicity was proposed [36]. In this study, we demonstrated that N-mustard-quinoline conjugates such as SL-1 and SL-2 preferentially targeted certain dG residues with the consensus sequence 5′-G-G/C-N-G-C/T-3′. This unique binding preference was not observed in the other N-mustard derivatives linked to different DNA-affinic carriers (such as acridine, 9-alinioacridines, or quinazolines) synthesized in our laboratory. As shown in Supplementary Figure S4 and S5, no distinct binding sequence was observed with an N-mustard 9-anilinoacridine conjugate (BO-1051) [6] and unmasked water soluble N-benzene mustard conjugates (BO-1055) [8]. These results suggested that the quinoline pharmacophore plays an important role in drug efficacy and safety. Intriguingly, McClean et al. [37] reported that when interacting with DNA, quaternary N-mustard 4-anilinoquinolinium conjugates (Supplementary Figure S7) bind strongly to AT-rich sequences in the minor groove. It remains unclear why the 6,7-methylenedioxy-quinoline pharmacophore in SL-1 prefers laying on 5′-G-C/T-3′, whereas the quaternary N-mustard 4-anilinoquinolinium conjugates favor binding to AT-rich minor grooves via their methyl quaternary salt. Since the linkers used in the SL-1 and the N-mustard-4-anilinoquinoline conjugate are hydrazinecarboxamide and aniline, respectively, we could not rule out the possibility that different linkers might induce varied sequence preferences before anchoring alkylation. However, unlike cisplatin and unmasked N-mustard conjugates, SL-1 creates sequence-dependent guanine adducts, which may reduce the inevitable side effects.